BART cellphone shutdown option introduced to board of directors in closed session; or, 3 Questions For #BART

by Gregory Foster

Trouble up and down the line for BART

Trouble up and down the line for BART

Before beginning, it’s worth stating that EFF-Austin [ @EFFaustin ] is based in…well, Austin. Our statements have no association with national EFF [ @EFF ], based in San Francisco, beyond the principles we share (see here for details on that history if you’re interested; our hearts go out to you guys during this challenge, you have our support). As such, EFF-Austin’s analysis is restricted to online sources and documents.

That analysis has revealed a discrepancy in the first public statement made by Lynette Sweet, a Director on BART’s board, in the wake of BART’s shutdown of cellphone and 911 service for passengers last Thursday between 4-7pm PST at least between the Civic Center and Embarcadero stations. Sweet provided an interview to San Francisco’s CBS affiliate KCBS in which she roundly condemned BART’s action. The statement that interested us occurs at the beginning of the interview (audio excerpt below):

“The BART board was alerted just a few hours before they planned to do this without having it as an agenda item. We really couldn’t talk much about it.”

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

That directed us to the Agenda for the board meeting in question, available on the BART website. That meeting was scheduled to begin at 9AM PST on Thursday August 11th. The cellphone shutdown occurred at 4pm PST that very same day.

#BART – Board Meeting (August 11, 2011) – Agenda

According to this version of the document, there is in fact a relevant agenda item listed on page 3:

10. CLOSED SESSION (Room 303, Board Conference Room)
A. THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES:
Consultation with: Chief of Police; Acting Manager, Rail Security
Programs; and Assistant General Manager – Operations
Government Code Section: 54957(a)

That’s some important information.

BART board meetings are scheduled in advance and a “Notice of Meetings” is sent out, sometimes with attachments. A notice for Thursday’s BART board meeting was sent out on August 5th, and included the agenda as an attachment. Here’s that notice:

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District – Notice of Meetings (Aug 5, 2011)

So, the agenda for Thursday’s BART board meeting—which includes reservation of a closed session timeslot for discussion of “THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES”—was ready to go by August 5th. Our analysis of the metadata embedded in the agenda document confirms this.

  • Document Author: Pat Williams (would love to chat!)
  • xap:CreatorTool: Microsoft Word 2007
  • Document Last Modified: 8/5/11 6:46:45pm

If this document is to be believed then a timeslot was reserved for a closed session with the board fully six days prior to the event. It’s important to emphasize that this does NOT necessarily mean that the subject matter of that meeting was determined in advance (I guess it’s equally important to emphasize it might mean just that!). At a minimum, it signifies awareness that a meeting might be necessary. That’s an important item to keep in mind as questions swirl about whether the BART board COULD have had time to deliberate a formal policy decision.

By now you might be wondering, as we were, about the people who participated in the meeting and what their responsibilities are. With a little help from the index of BART Job Descriptions and Google, we were able to identify these folks for future reference:

Kenton W. Rainey, BART Police Chief

Kenton W. Rainey, BART Police Chief
Image credit: Oakland North - A new chief for the BART police seeks to heal community ties


Sgt. Eugene Wong, left, and Sgt. Kevin Franklin patrol a San Francisco BART line.


Paul Oversier at the BART Police Department Review (November 11, 2009)

Paul Oversier (far left) at the BART Police Department Review (November 11, 2009)
Image credit: Indybay


A few things seem clear to your observers from Texas. It seems like the BART Board has been having its own internal trouble for quite some time. And it seems like there is an adversarial relationship between the board and other parts of the BART organization. And it seems like the BART system in general is in trouble both financially and in terms of customer satisfaction; their biannual customer satisfaction survey (p. 16) indicates “40 out of 47 ratings (85%) of specific service attributes were lower in 2010 compared to 2008.” And it seems like BART just keeps digging the hole deeper, such as with this over produced video—completed overnight on Thursday August 11 in time for publication to YouTube and promotion by 8:38am PST Friday morning—which could be characterized as a “preemptive strike” seeking to justify BART’s actions on Thursday night:

Unless BART gets their act together, and stops taking an adversarial stance to world opinion, this debacle could truly result in greater formally codified civil liberties for Americans as an example for the rest of the world to follow. But I guess that’s what America is supposed to be all about, right?

I present BART with these questions three, answer rite we might forgive ye:

  1. When did the cellphone shutdown option become the subject of the timeslot reserved sometime before Friday August 5th, 2011 at 6:46:45pm PST?
  2. When was the cellphone shutdown option conceived?
  3. Why wasn’t the BART board of directors notified of the cellphone shutdown option some time  between  times A and B?

Thank you, and help us do the right thing now, BART.

Next: BART’s Protest Position Does Not Withstand Legal Scrutiny
Earlier: Statement on San Francisco BART cellphone service shutdown

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Daniel August 16, 2011 at 4:44 pm

Thanks for getting this out there guys!

Gregory Foster August 17, 2011 at 12:31 am

It’s because of @DanielMorgan‘s rigorous and insightful article that I learned I had introduced doubt as to the exact date of this past Thursday‘s #BART board meeting by renaming the Agenda file incorrectly. The title of the Scribd-hosted version of the file was also written incorrectly. I’ve fixed that by uploading a new revision of the same Agenda file available on BART’s website, but with the correct date in the filename this time. I’ve updated the embedded code in this post accordingly.

Thank you Daniel! I hope a lot of people invest quality time reading your post carefully to better understand what is at stake here.

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: